EU AI Act Art. 15 sets cybersecurity expectations for high-risk AI, and NIS2 raises the bar for essential entities. Tresor’s hardware isolation, EU hosting, and verifiable attestation are concrete technical controls, not contractual assurances.
Confidential AI for government and public sector.
Adopt AI for policy drafting, citizen correspondence, and internal analysis without shifting sensitive public sector work onto infrastructure accessible to a general AI operator.
Government
Where normal AI breaks.
Public sector AI has to withstand sovereignty scrutiny, procurement review, and the basic reality that officials cannot paste sensitive case material into consumer tools.
Citizen data protection
Case files, correspondence, and internal records stay out of normal operator reach, which matters when the data belongs to the public.
Sovereign deployment posture
Teams can keep sensitive processing aligned with European hosting and procurement expectations instead of defaulting to offshore consumer AI services.
Audit and procurement traceability
Security, legal, and procurement teams can review technical evidence for the confidentiality model before approving wider adoption.
What teams can ship with Tresor.
Policy drafting, citizen correspondence, internal analysis, and knowledge retrieval become practical when workloads stay on infrastructure that can be technically and cryptographically reviewed.
Draft policy notes and briefings
Prepare decision memos, speeches, and policy drafts from internal material without moving the plaintext into a consumer AI flow.
Search legislation and internal records
Find the relevant rule, precedent, or internal guidance across long document sets in one protected workspace.
Summarize casework and reports
Reduce long reports, correspondence chains, and administrative files into concise summaries that stay inside the approved environment.
Controls that hold up under review.
Security, legal, and procurement teams need the same answer: where did the data run, who could read it, and how do we check?
Zero-access processing
Citizen records, policy material, and internal analysis stays readable only in the browser and inside attested compute, not in an operator-accessible app tier.
EU-hosted by design
Routing, storage, and execution stay aligned with European sovereignty and procurement expectations instead of backhauling work into a general public AI stack.
Signed proof on every run
Each response can be tied back to cryptographic receipts and published verification material, so security and compliance teams can check the claim themselves.
Start with one workflow.
Most public sector teams begin with a bounded workflow such as document review, case correspondence, or internal policy search, then widen access only after the controls are accepted.
01
Choose a workflow with clear review boundaries
Policy drafting, internal analysis, and citizen response support are common places to start.
02
Document the verification model up front
Bring security and procurement into the rollout early so the technical posture is reviewed before usage spreads informally.
03
Expand agency by agency
Reuse the same operating model for adjacent teams instead of redefining the confidentiality posture each time.
Questions from government teams.
Understand the technical details.
Zero-Access AI Conversations:
How Tresor Protects Your Privacy
Executive Summary
Tresor is built on a simple promise: your conversations belong to you, not us. Every message you type is protected by end-to-end encryption and processed only inside secure computing environments that even Tresor cannot inspect. Teams can now collaborate inside shared workspaces without ever handing Tresor access to their plaintext. This whitepaper explains the principles and safeguards behind Tresor’s zero-access design, showing how we deliver practical confidentiality without trade-offs in usability.
Powered by frontier models.
The best of open source, isolated and verifiable in Zero-Access TEEs.
